Illusions and Realities in Ibsen’s Plays The Wild Duck and Ghosts Essay

Illusions and Realities in Ibsens Plays The Wild Duck and Ghosts In Ibsens The Wild Duck, illusions and reality ar set into a conflict within the fable of a sons personal desire to confront idealism. Throughout much of the play, the son, Greger, argues the value of truth with the reluctant Dr. Relling. Relling insists on the importance of illusions, but fails to reject Gregers intentions and a play that begins as a comedy quickly turns into a tragedy because of these conflicts. At the heart of the illusions in this play be the ship canal that people assume many roles in a family, impersonating multiple ideals as ways for managing their traffichips. This theme of impersonation is also developed in Ibsens Ghosts, where family relations are slowly undone as the illusions and deceptions are stripped away. In both plays, deceptions are strategic and designed to protect the children from the pains and struggles of their families histories. Ultimately, in these plays, familie s are held together by illusions, yet torn apart by truths that have been concealed to protect the children. In The Wild Duck, as Relling continues to discourage Greger from revealing negative truths about family secrets, Relling insists, If you take away make-believe from the average man, you take away happiness as well (Ibsen, 294). Relling is referring to the ways the Ekdal family is structured on particular deceptions however, these are designed to protect the innocent as well as the blameworthy. Hedvig, the fourteen year old daughter, represents one of the innocents, and Gregers father, Old Werle, represents a part of the guilty side. The key to these dualisms of false and truth, innocent and guilty, illusion and reality, lies in... ... necessary illusion. Both The Wild Duck, and Ghosts are tragedies that involve what might be understood as the sins of the fathers however, Ibsen seems to suggest that roughly truths are better maintained as illusions. In both play s, the truth destroys the lives of those who have been protected from the past and in both cases the past involves relationships that have corroborative consequences on the childrens understandings of their lives. In the end, whether it is right or wrong to maintain the illusions is not as significant as the question of who has the right to determine what is real, and what is certain for others.Works CitedWorks CitedWorks Cited Henrik Ibsen, The Wild Duck, Four Great Plays by Henrik Ibsen, NY Bantam Books. Henrik Ibsen, Ghosts, Playreaders Repertory, M.R. White and F. Whiting, Eds., London Foresom and Company.